Transparency alternatives to Packetriot
Other Network connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Packetriot. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
7 shown of 7 that differ from Packetriot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Packetriot has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Packetriot” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Packetriot | Found at Packetriot, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ngrokngrok.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ngrok | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Pangolinpangolin.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Pangolin | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| ZeroTier Centralzerotier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZeroTier Central | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Netmakernetmaker.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Netmaker | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| localhost.runlocalhost.runSee also Transparency alternatives to localhost.run | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Pinggypinggy.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinggy | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Router Architectsrouterarchitects.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Router Architects | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.