Transparency alternatives to Netmaker
Other Network connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Netmaker does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
6 shown of 6 that differ from Netmaker on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Netmaker has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Netmaker does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Netmaker does not | Netmaker publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ngrokngrok.com | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Pangolinpangolin.net | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ZeroTier Centralzerotier.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Packetriotpacketriot.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Pinggypinggy.io | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| localhost.runlocalhost.run | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.