Alternatives to SonicWall
Other Network monitoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SonicWall does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from SonicWall on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
SonicWall has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SonicWall does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and SonicWall does not | SonicWall publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LogicMonitorlogicmonitor.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Kentikkentik.com | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Paesslerpaessler.com | 43/100 | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Netgear Insightnetgear.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Catchpointcatchpoint.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Securepointsecurepoint.de | 17/100 | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Auvikauvik.com | 52/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TP-Link Omadatp-link.com | 35/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Ubiquitiui.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cambiumcambiumnetworks.com | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Domotzdomotz.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Icingaicinga.com | 22/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.