SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to TeleMate

Other Network monitoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TeleMate does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from TeleMate on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TeleMate has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and TeleMate does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and TeleMate does notTeleMate publishes, and they do not
Kentikkentik.com 70/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Auvikauvik.com 52/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Paesslerpaessler.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
LogicMonitorlogicmonitor.com 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
WatchGuardwatchguard.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Cambiumcambiumnetworks.com 26/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Catchpointcatchpoint.com 26/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zscalerzscaler.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Ubiquitiui.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Netgear Insightnetgear.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Palo Alto Networkspaloaltonetworks.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Icingaicinga.com 22/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.