SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to iRaiser

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that iRaiser does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from iRaiser on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

iRaiser has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and iRaiser does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and iRaiser does notiRaiser publishes, and they do not
Beaconbeaconcrm.org 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Handbidhandbid.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Donorboxdonorbox.org 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Donorfydonorfy.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Funraisefunraise.org 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
VerticalChangeverticalchange.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Bloomerangbloomerang.co 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Blackbaudblackbaud.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Givebuttergivebutter.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
OneCauseonecause.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Raisenowraisenow.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
JustGivingjustgiving.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.