SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Parkopedia

Other Parking management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Parkopedia does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Parkopedia on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Parkopedia has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Parkopedia does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Parkopedia does notParkopedia publishes, and they do not
Justparkjustpark.com 24/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Designadesigna.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Wemolowemolo.com 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Easyparkeasypark.net 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Parkwhizparkwhiz.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Paybyphonepaybyphone.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Parkmobileparkmobile.io 13/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Parksterparkster.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Passportpassportinc.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Peter Parkpeter-park.de 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Contiparkcontipark.de 10/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Ampidoampido.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.