SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Unity5 Zatpark

Other Parking management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Unity5 Zatpark does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Unity5 Zatpark on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Unity5 Zatpark has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Unity5 Zatpark does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Unity5 Zatpark does notUnity5 Zatpark publishes, and they do not
Parkableparkable.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Justparkjustpark.com 24/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Parkalotparkalot.io 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Designadesigna.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Skidataskidata.com 22/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Easyparkeasypark.net 19/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Parqueryparquery.com 19/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Parkwhizparkwhiz.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Paybyphonepaybyphone.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Scheidt Bachmannscheidt-bachmann.de 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Wemolowemolo.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Spotherospothero.com 14/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.