SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Modulr

Other Payment orchestration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Modulr does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Modulr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Modulr has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Modulr does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Modulr does notModulr publishes, and they do not
IXOPAYixopay.com 50/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Marqetamarqeta.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Spreedlyspreedly.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
BR-DGEbr-dge.to 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Payrailspayrails.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Primerprimer.io 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Corefycorefy.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Increaseincrease.com 30/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Nomupaynomupay.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Weavrweavr.io 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Payneteasypayneteasy.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Akuratecoakurateco.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.