SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Token.io

Other Payment orchestration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Token.io does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Token.io on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Token.io has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Token.io does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Token.io does notToken.io publishes, and they do not
Yunoy.uno 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Rebillyrebilly.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
IXOPAYixopay.com 45/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Spreedlyspreedly.com 43/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Increaseincrease.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
TrueLayertruelayer.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Unitunit.co 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Marqetamarqeta.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Modulrmodulrfinance.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Yapilyyapily.com 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Silverflowsilverflow.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Corefycorefy.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.