SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Tink

Other Payment orchestration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tink does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Tink on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tink has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Tink does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tink does notTink publishes, and they do not
Rebillyrebilly.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
IXOPAYixopay.com 50/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Spreedlyspreedly.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Marqetamarqeta.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Unitunit.co 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Solarissolarisgroup.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Corefycorefy.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Increaseincrease.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
BR-DGEbr-dge.to 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Payrailspayrails.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Primerprimer.io 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
TrueLayertruelayer.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.