SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to SumUp

Other Payment processing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SumUp does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from SumUp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SumUp has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and SumUp does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SumUp does notSumUp publishes, and they do not
Maxiomaxio.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Adyenadyen.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Molliemollie.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
GoCardlessgocardless.com 55/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Recurlyrecurly.com 55/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Lemon Squeezylemonsqueezy.com 50/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Stancerstancer.com 45/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
Squaresquareup.com 40/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Paddlepaddle.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Stripestripe.com 30/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Braintreebraintreepayments.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Airwallexairwallex.com 30/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.