SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Zuora

Other Payment processing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Zuora does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Zuora on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Zuora has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Zuora does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Zuora does notZuora publishes, and they do not
Maxiomaxio.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 nothing Compare
Adyenadyen.com 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Molliemollie.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
GoCardlessgocardless.com 55/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Recurlyrecurly.com 55/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
SumUpsumup.com 50/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Stancerstancer.com 45/100 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Lemon Squeezylemonsqueezy.com 50/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Squaresquareup.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Paddlepaddle.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Airwallexairwallex.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Stripestripe.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.