SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Gem Logic

Other Retail point of sale vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Gem Logic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Gem Logic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gem Logic has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Gem Logic does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Gem Logic does notGem Logic publishes, and they do not
Kassensichvfiskaly.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
RepairDeskrepairdesk.co 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Olabiolabi.ooo 32/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Fixably Repairfixably.com 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Verifoneverifone.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Citrus-Lime Cloud POScitruslime.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Tillhubtillhub.de 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Efstaefsta.eu 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
SMRT Systemssmrtsystems.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Ccvccv.eu 14/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Cloud Retailercloudretailer.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
MicroBizmicrobiz.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.