SaaS transparency ranking · Industry and operations
Print and packaging software vendors, ranked by what they publish
MIS, prepress and web-to-print for printers, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
6 vendors measured on their own sites, last on 2026-09-02. 3 ranked, 3 without enough data for a score. A vendor we could not measure often enough gets no rank at all, rather than a bad one.
Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.
- Print and packaging software6
- All categories26
6 vendors
Sort by Score Name Last checked
Filters (0)
- ✓ found, source linked
- × not found at the addresses we checked
- – not measured by us
- 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
-
1
Comosoftcomosoft.comTransparency 9/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 10 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 9/100 = weight of what we found (2) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 1 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: No third-party tracking before consent ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 11 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
2
Aleyantaleyant.comTransparency 6/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not measured
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not measured
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 7 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 6/100 = weight of what we found (1) divided by weight of what we could measure (17). Rank 2 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 8 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Not measured by us, 3 criteria: Data location stated ×3, Public pricing ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
3
Axaioaxaio.comTransparency 0/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 11 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 0/100 = weight of what we found (0) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 3 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 12 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
Accuradatatech.uk.comNot enough data: 2 of 12 criteria measured, so no transparency score
- Data processing agreement: not measured
- Subprocessor list: not measured
- Data location stated: not measured
- Status page with history: not measured
- Public pricing: not measured
- Certifications named: not measured
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
Gap: HTTPS enforced with HSTS and 1 moreWhy this rank?
No score: we could measure 2 of 12 criteria, and below 9 there is no number and no rank. That is a statement about our measurement, not about the vendor.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 2 criteria: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2.
Not measured by us, 10 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
Callascallassoftware.comNot enough data: 7 of 12 criteria measured, so no transparency score
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not measured
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
Gap: Data processing agreement and 5 moreWhy this rank?
No score: we could measure 7 of 12 criteria, and below 9 there is no number and no rank. That is a statement about our measurement, not about the vendor.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: Data location stated ×3.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 6 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2.
Not measured by us, 5 criteria: Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
Compartcompart.comNot enough data: 2 of 12 criteria measured, so no transparency score
- Data processing agreement: not measured
- Subprocessor list: not measured
- Data location stated: not measured
- Status page with history: not measured
- Public pricing: not measured
- Certifications named: not measured
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
Gap: No third-party tracking before consentWhy this rank?
No score: we could measure 2 of 12 criteria, and below 9 there is no number and no rank. That is a statement about our measurement, not about the vendor.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 1 criterion: No third-party tracking before consent ×2.
Not measured by us, 10 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
Tick two vendors above.
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.