Transparency alternatives to DBHawk
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that DBHawk does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from DBHawk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
DBHawk has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and DBHawk does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and DBHawk does not | DBHawk publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Tailscaletailscale.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| C1c1.ai | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +4 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| SailPointsailpoint.com | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Twingatetwingate.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Admin By Requestadminbyrequest.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.net | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.io | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.