Transparency alternatives to Reltio
Other Product information management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Reltio. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Reltio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reltio has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Reltio” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Reltio | Found at Reltio, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siffletsiffletdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sifflet | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Sodasoda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Soda | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Alationalation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alation | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Ataccamaataccama.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ataccama | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Fozzelsfozzels.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fozzels | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Castorcastordoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| GoDataFeedgodatafeed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoDataFeed | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Plytixplytix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plytix | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Atlanatlan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlan | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Feedbirdfeedbird.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedbird | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Monte Carlomontecarlodata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monte Carlo | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Feedonomicsfeedonomics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedonomics | 23/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.