Transparency alternatives to Sifflet
Other Product information management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sifflet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Sifflet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sifflet has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Sifflet” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sifflet | Found at Sifflet, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reltioreltio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reltio | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Sodasoda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Soda | 65/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Alationalation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alation | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| data.worlddata.worldSee also Transparency alternatives to data.world | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Ataccamaataccama.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ataccama | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Castorcastordoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| GoDataFeedgodatafeed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoDataFeed | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| inriverinriver.comSee also Transparency alternatives to inriver | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Atlanatlan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlan | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Fozzelsfozzels.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fozzels | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Monte Carlomontecarlodata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monte Carlo | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Akeneoakeneo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Akeneo | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.