SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Sifflet

Other Product information management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sifflet does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from Sifflet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sifflet has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Sifflet does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Sifflet does notSifflet publishes, and they do not
Reltioreltio.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Alationalation.com 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Ataccamaataccama.com 43/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
data.worlddata.world 39/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Akeneoakeneo.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Castorcastordoc.com 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare
GoDataFeedgodatafeed.com 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Atlanatlan.com 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Monte Carlomontecarlodata.com 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Salsifysalsify.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Collibracollibra.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare
inriverinriver.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.