Transparency alternatives to DoorLoop
Other Property management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at DoorLoop. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 63 that differ from DoorLoop on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
DoorLoop has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at DoorLoop” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at DoorLoop | Found at DoorLoop, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plentificplentific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plentific | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| RealPagerealpage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RealPage | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| DomLiftdomliftapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DomLift | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Aareonaareon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aareon | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Propertywarepropertyware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propertyware | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| 10ninety10ninety.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to 10ninety | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Rentilarentila.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rentila | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| RentRedirentredi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RentRedi | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Integrator Housing Solutionsintegrator.solutionsSee also Transparency alternatives to Integrator Housing Solutions | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Jupixjupix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jupix | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Zegogozego.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zego | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Valcrevalcre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valcre | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.