Transparency alternatives to DomLift
Other Property management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at DomLift. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 62 that differ from DomLift on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
DomLift has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at DomLift” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at DomLift | Found at DomLift, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plentificplentific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plentific | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| DoorLoopdoorloop.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DoorLoop | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RealPagerealpage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RealPage | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Propertywarepropertyware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propertyware | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Valcrevalcre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valcre | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Buildiumbuildium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Buildium | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| HelloReporthelloreport.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to HelloReport | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| TurboTenantturbotenant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TurboTenant | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Aareonaareon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aareon | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Landlord Studiolandlordstudio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Landlord Studio | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LetHublethub.coSee also Transparency alternatives to LetHub | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stessastessa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stessa | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.