SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to ENKON Integral-LIS

Other Property management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ENKON Integral-LIS does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 56 that differ from ENKON Integral-LIS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ENKON Integral-LIS has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ENKON Integral-LIS does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and ENKON Integral-LIS does notENKON Integral-LIS publishes, and they do not
Plentificplentific.com 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
RealPagerealpage.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Propertywarepropertyware.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Valcrevalcre.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Aareonaareon.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
DoorLoopdoorloop.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
10ninety10ninety.co.uk 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
RentRedirentredi.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Landlord Studiolandlordstudio.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
LetHublethub.co 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Rentilarentila.com 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Arthur Onlinearthuronline.co.uk 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.