SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Estates IT

Other Property management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Estates IT does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 51 that differ from Estates IT on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Estates IT has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Estates IT does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Estates IT does notEstates IT publishes, and they do not
Plentificplentific.com 74/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
RealPagerealpage.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Propertywarepropertyware.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Valcrevalcre.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Aareonaareon.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
DoorLoopdoorloop.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Landlord Studiolandlordstudio.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
LetHublethub.co 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
10ninety10ninety.co.uk 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Rentilarentila.com 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
RentRedirentredi.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Arthur Onlinearthuronline.co.uk 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.