Transparency alternatives to Covis AI
Other Proposals and quoting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Covis AI does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Covis AI on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Covis AI has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Covis AI does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Covis AI does not | Covis AI publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AutoRFPautorfp.ai | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Scoroscoro.com | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Responsiveresponsive.io | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| QorusDocsqorusdocs.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PROSpros.com | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Qwilrqwilr.com | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Arphiearphie.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Loopioloopio.com | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Foveatefoveate.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Mercuramercura.io | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Omnia Retailomniaretail.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Proposifyproposify.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.