SaaS Ranking
Menu

AutoRFP: what they publish

autorfp.ai · Proposals and quoting · checked 2026-10-12

74/100BBand B

Rank 1 of 47 in Proposals and quoting, where the median is 17.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-12. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

5 days since the newest dated result, 5 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

AutoRFP

autorfp.ai · Proposals and quoting

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
B 74of 100 Rank 1 of 47

Published commitments7 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-12. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that AutoRFP has no such document.

Where AutoRFP sits in Proposals and quoting

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 2%
  3. C3 6%
  4. D6 13%
  5. E7 15%
  6. F30 64%
47 vendors with a score; 1 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of AutoRFP is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What AutoRFP states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-12.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.autorfp.ai/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://autorfp.ai/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://autorfp.ai.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Proposals and quoting: 5 of 46 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-12.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://autorfp.ai/ – third-party requests before any interaction: bzr.openai.com, bzrcdn.openai.com, capi-automation.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com, cdn-cookieyes.com, connect.facebook.net, directory.cookieyes.com, forms.hscollectedforms.net, ingest.promptwatch.com, js-na1.hs-scripts.com, js.hs-banner.com, js.hscollectedforms.net, log.cookieyes.com, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, sc.lfeeder.com, tr.lfeeder.com, tracker.searchableanalytics.com, tracking-api.g2.com, tracking.g2crowd.com, www.facebook.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Proposals and quoting: 2 of 47 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-12.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://autorfp.ai/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Proposals and quoting: 4 of 45 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://autorfp.ai/legal/privacy · checked 2026-10-12

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://autorfp.ai/legal/privacy – found, but behind a sign-in
  2. https://autorfp.ai/privacy – found, but behind a sign-in
  3. https://autorfp.ai/privacy-policy – found, but behind a sign-in
  4. https://autorfp.ai/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://autorfp.ai/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://autorfp.ai/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://autorfp.ai/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Proposals and quoting: 15 of 47 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 8
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://autorfp.ai/legal/dpa · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Proposals and quoting: 8 of 47 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://autorfp.ai/trust/subprocessors · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Proposals and quoting: 6 of 47 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Australia, Germany. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    ident Response Plan Incident Response Team Product Security Hosting options in US, EU & AU We offer hosting in either the US, EU (Germany) or Australia, depending on your preferences and needs.

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/trust

    ident Response Plan Incident Response Team Product Security Hosting options in US, EU & AU We offer hosting in either the US, EU (Germany) or Australia, depending on your preferences and needs.

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/trust

Source: https://autorfp.ai/trust · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Data location stated in Proposals and quoting: 14 of 47 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://autorfp.ai/pricing · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Public pricing in Proposals and quoting: 28 of 47 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/

Source: https://autorfp.ai/ · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Proposals and quoting: 30 of 48 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://autorfp.ai/legal/dpa · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Proposals and quoting: 8 of 47 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (named without a certification claim), SOC 2 Type II (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    Continuously monitored with Drata Reviewed & trusted in 44+ countries Browse documents ISO 27001:2022 SOC 2 Type II GDPR & UK GDPR CCPA EU Cloud CoC Overview Compliance Documents Controls Data & h

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/trust

    ISO 27001:2022 & SOC 2 compliant AutoRFP.ai is ISO 27001:2022 certified and leverages Drata for real-time monitoring.

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/trust

    ntinuously monitored with Drata Reviewed & trusted in 44+ countries Browse documents ISO 27001:2022 SOC 2 Type II GDPR & UK GDPR CCPA EU Cloud CoC Overview Compliance Documents Controls Data & hosting...

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/trust

Source: https://autorfp.ai/trust · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Certifications named in Proposals and quoting: 14 of 47 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.95 %.
    Show the exact wording

    use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure the Services have an Uptime Availability of at least 99.95% during any calendar month.

    Read at https://autorfp.ai/legal/sla

Source: https://autorfp.ai/legal/sla · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Proposals and quoting: 5 of 47 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-05: 74 of 1002026-10-12: 74 of 100 2026-10-05 2026-10-12
Score over the last 2 runs we measured AutoRFP in: 74 (2026-10-05), 74 (2026-10-12).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

AutoRFP

8 found · 4 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-12.

Investigate 4 open evidence questions
  1. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  2. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  3. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  4. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.