Alternatives to Loopio
Other Proposals and quoting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Loopio does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Loopio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Loopio has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Loopio does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Loopio does not | Loopio publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scoroscoro.com | 65/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| PROSpros.com | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| AutoRFPautorfp.ai | 74/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Responsiveresponsive.io | 61/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Omnia Retailomniaretail.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Arphiearphie.ai | 39/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Tactontacton.com | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Buynomicsbuynomics.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Vendavovendavo.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Better Proposalsbetterproposals.io | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Minderestminderest.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Intelligence Nodeintelligencenode.com | 18/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.