SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Dot Compliance

Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Dot Compliance does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Dot Compliance on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Dot Compliance has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Dot Compliance does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Dot Compliance does notDot Compliance publishes, and they do not
Qualioqualio.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Ketryxketryx.com 43/100 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Arenaarenasolutions.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Cognidoxcognidox.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Castor EDCcastoredc.com 17/100 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Openbomopenbom.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Orcanosorcanos.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Durodurolabs.co 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Greenlight Gurugreenlight.guru 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Rimsysrimsys.io 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
CAQ AGcaq.de 18/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Isolocityisolocity.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.