SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Elumina

Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Elumina does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 68 that differ from Elumina on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Elumina has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Elumina does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Elumina does notElumina publishes, and they do not
Ketryxketryx.com 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
SimplerQMSsimplerqms.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Qualioqualio.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Cognidoxcognidox.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
myoshmyosh.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Grand Avenue Softwaregrandavenue.com 35/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Propelpropelsoftware.com 35/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Arenaarenasolutions.com 26/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
SoftComplysoftcomply.com 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Castor EDCcastoredc.com 17/100 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
AM System Classicamsystem.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.