Transparency alternatives to mySHEQ
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that mySHEQ does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from mySHEQ on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
mySHEQ has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and mySHEQ does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and mySHEQ does not | mySHEQ publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ketryxketryx.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Qualioqualio.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| myoshmyosh.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Grand Avenue Softwaregrandavenue.com | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Propelpropelsoftware.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SoftComplysoftcomply.com | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Castor EDCcastoredc.com | 17/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| AM System Classicamsystem.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.