SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PreservationVault

Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PreservationVault does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 14 that differ from PreservationVault on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PreservationVault has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PreservationVault does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PreservationVault does notPreservationVault publishes, and they do not
Objective ECMobjective.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
AvePoint Recordsavepoint.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Collabwarecollabware.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Square 9square-9.com 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
RecordPointrecordpoint.com 17/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Feithfeith.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ricoh Recordsricoh.com 13/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Computhinkcomputhink.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gimmalgimmal.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Webrecorder Browsertrixwebrecorder.net 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Access Corpaccesscorp.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.