Transparency alternatives to Wonderlic
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Wonderlic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Wonderlic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Wonderlic has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Wonderlic does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Wonderlic does not | Wonderlic publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryqbryq.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| TestGorillatestgorilla.com | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Toggl Hiretoggl.com | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.io | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.com | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.com | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| HireVuehirevue.com | 43/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Adafaceadaface.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Criteriacriteriacorp.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Feenyxfeenyx.ai | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Qualifiedqualified.io | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Traitifytraitify.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.