Transparency alternatives to Retail Acuity
Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Retail Acuity does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from Retail Acuity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Retail Acuity has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Retail Acuity does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Retail Acuity does not | Retail Acuity publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firstupfirstup.io | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| MangoAppsmangoapps.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Repslyrepsly.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Axeroaxerosolutions.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Simpplrsimpplr.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| YOOBICyoobic.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Happeohappeo.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Haiilohaiilo.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Interactinteractsoftware.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Legionlegion.co | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Flipgetflip.com | 30/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Jostlejostle.me | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.