Transparency alternatives to Narvar
Other Returns management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Narvar. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Narvar on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Narvar has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Narvar” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Narvar | Found at Narvar, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WeSupplywesupplylabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeSupply | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Loop Returnsloopreturns.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loop Returns | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Claimlaneclaimlane.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Claimlane | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Swap Commerceswap-commerce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swap Commerce | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| ClickPostclickpost.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickPost | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| yaylohyayloh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to yayloh | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| PostCopostco.coSee also Transparency alternatives to PostCo | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Redogetredo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Redo | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| ReturnLogicreturnlogic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReturnLogic | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Refundidrefundid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Refundid | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| FloorFoundfloorfound.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloorFound | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| ReadyCloudreadycloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReadyCloud | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.