Transparency alternatives to Enter
Other Healthcare revenue cycle vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Enter. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Enter on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Enter has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Enter” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Enter | Found at Enter, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CollaborateMDcollaboratemd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CollaborateMD | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AdvancedMDadvancedmd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AdvancedMD | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Availityavaility.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Availity | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Candid Healthjoincandidhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Candid Health | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CodaMetrixcodametrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodaMetrix | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ensemble Healthensemblehp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ensemble Health | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Noble Directnobledirect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Noble Direct | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PayZenpayzen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PayZen | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Salucrosalucro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Salucro | 14/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cedarcedar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cedar | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AKASAakasa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AKASA | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Fathomfathomhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.