Transparency alternatives to PayZen
Other Healthcare revenue cycle vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at PayZen. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from PayZen on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PayZen has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at PayZen” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at PayZen | Found at PayZen, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterenter.healthSee also Transparency alternatives to Enter | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CollaborateMDcollaboratemd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CollaborateMD | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AdvancedMDadvancedmd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AdvancedMD | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Availityavaility.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Availity | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Candid Healthjoincandidhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Candid Health | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cedarcedar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cedar | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CodaMetrixcodametrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodaMetrix | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ensemble Healthensemblehp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ensemble Health | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Noble Directnobledirect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Noble Direct | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Salucrosalucro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Salucro | 14/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AKASAakasa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AKASA | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fathomfathomhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.