Alternatives to Infinx
Other Healthcare revenue cycle vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Infinx does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 19 that differ from Infinx on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Infinx has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Infinx does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Infinx does not | Infinx publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterenter.health | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Availityavaility.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| AKASAakasa.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Candid Healthjoincandidhealth.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Parallonparallon.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| CollaborateMDcollaboratemd.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| PayZenpayzen.com | 9/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| AdvancedMDadvancedmd.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Cedarcedar.com | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| CodaMetrixcodametrix.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Fathomfathomhealth.com | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| FinThrivefinthrive.com | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.