Transparency alternatives to 2-Track
Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that 2-Track does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 65 that differ from 2-Track on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
2-Track has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and 2-Track does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and 2-Track does not | 2-Track publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RideCorideco.com | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| NextBillion.ainextbillion.ai | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lytxlytx.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Tookanjungleworks.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Badger Mapsbadgermapping.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Netradynenetradyne.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| One Step GPSonestepgps.com | 35/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Routalroutal.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Navixynavixy.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Routificroutific.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Nautonauto.com | 30/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| TripShottripshot.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.