Transparency alternatives to Kompyte
Other Digital adoption and enablement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kompyte. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Kompyte on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kompyte has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Kompyte” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Kompyte | Found at Kompyte, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spekitspekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spekit | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ElevenLabselevenlabs.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to ElevenLabs | 67/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Synthesiasynthesia.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Synthesia | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Murfmurf.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Murf | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Oraiorai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orai | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pitch Avatarpitchavatar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitch Avatar | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Crayoncrayon.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Crayon | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| HeyGenheygen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HeyGen | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| WellSaidwellsaid.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to WellSaid | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bigtincanbigtincan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bigtincan | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Colossyancolossyan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Colossyan | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Poisedpoised.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Poised | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.