Transparency alternatives to Bigtincan
Other Digital adoption and enablement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Bigtincan. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Bigtincan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Bigtincan has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Bigtincan” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Bigtincan | Found at Bigtincan, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spekitspekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spekit | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| ElevenLabselevenlabs.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to ElevenLabs | 67/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Synthesiasynthesia.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Synthesia | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Oraiorai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orai | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Murfmurf.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Murf | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pitch Avatarpitchavatar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitch Avatar | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| WellSaidwellsaid.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to WellSaid | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Crayoncrayon.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Crayon | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| HeyGenheygen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HeyGen | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Colossyancolossyan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Colossyan | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kompytekompyte.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kompyte | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Poisedpoised.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Poised | 39/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.