SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Fresha

Other Salon and spa booking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fresha does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Fresha on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Fresha has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fresha does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Fresha does notFresha publishes, and they do not
Boulevardjoinblvd.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Schedulistaschedulista.com 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zenotizenoti.com 17/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
GlossGeniusglossgenius.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Kitombakitomba.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Phorestphorest.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Meevomeevo.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Shortcutsshortcuts.net 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Simple Salonsimplesalon.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Slickgetslick.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Genbookgenbook.com 22/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Booksybooksy.com 18/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.