SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Zenoti

Other Salon and spa booking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Zenoti. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Zenoti on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Zenoti has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Zenoti” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ZenotiFound at Zenoti, not found there
Slickgetslick.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slick 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Boulevardjoinblvd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boulevard 30/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
GlossGeniusglossgenius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GlossGenius 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Salon Ultimatesalonultimate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Salon Ultimate 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Schedulistaschedulista.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Schedulista 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Beubeuapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beu 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Studiobookrstudiobookr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Studiobookr 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Terminzterminz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Terminz 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
You'reOnTimeyoureontime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to You'reOnTime 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Freshafresha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fresha 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mangomintmangomint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangomint 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Rosyrosysalonsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rosy 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.