SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SecurityHive

Other Security guard workforce vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SecurityHive does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from SecurityHive on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SecurityHive has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SecurityHive does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SecurityHive does notSecurityHive publishes, and they do not
Trackforcetrackforce.com 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 1 Public pricing Compare
Trackforce Valianttrackforcevaliant.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
Onticontic.co 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Connecteamconnecteam.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Belfrybelfrysoftware.com 26/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Winteamteamsoftware.com 13/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Public pricing Compare
GuardsProguardspro.com 11/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
BizSchedulerbizscheduler.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Detexdetex.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Guardhouseguardhouse.com.au 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Novagemsnovagems.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Vertxvertx.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.