Transparency alternatives to Timekeeping Systems
Other Security guard workforce vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Timekeeping Systems does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 17 that differ from Timekeeping Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Timekeeping Systems has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Timekeeping Systems does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Timekeeping Systems does not | Timekeeping Systems publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trackforcetrackforce.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Trackforce Valianttrackforcevaliant.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onticontic.co | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Belfrybelfrysoftware.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Connecteamconnecteam.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| SecurityHivesecurityhive.io | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Winteamteamsoftware.com | 13/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GuardsProguardspro.com | 11/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| BizSchedulerbizscheduler.com | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Detexdetex.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Guardhouseguardhouse.com.au | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Novagemsnovagems.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.