SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Surfer

Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Surfer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Surfer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Surfer has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Surfer does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Surfer does notSurfer publishes, and they do not
Conductorconductor.com 55/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Ahrefsahrefs.com 50/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
seoClarityseoclarity.net 50/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.com 45/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
Frasefrase.io 40/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Mozmoz.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Mangoolsmangools.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
BrightEdgebrightedge.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
OnCrawloncrawl.com 21/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
AccuRankeraccuranker.com 35/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Dragon Metricsdragonmetrics.com 35/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Semrushsemrush.com 35/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.