SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Wazuh

Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Wazuh does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Wazuh on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Wazuh has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Wazuh does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Wazuh does notWazuh publishes, and they do not
Expelexpel.com 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Huntresshuntress.com 57/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Pantherpanther.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ontinueontinue.com 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Trend Microtrendmicro.com 35/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gigamongigamon.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Blumirablumira.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Corocoro.net 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Arctic Wolfarcticwolf.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Atomicorp Atomic OSSECatomicorp.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Securonixsecuronix.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Corelightcorelight.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.