Transparency alternatives to Quintly
Other Social listening vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Quintly. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Quintly on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Quintly has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Quintly” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Quintly | Found at Quintly, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meltwatermeltwater.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meltwater | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Prezlyprezly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prezly | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Brand24brand24.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brand24 | 36/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| YouScanyouscan.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to YouScan | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Onclusiveonclusive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onclusive | 13/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Determdeterm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Determ | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Synthesiosynthesio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Synthesio | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Socialinsidersocialinsider.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Socialinsider | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Presspagepresspage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Presspage | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Talkwalkertalkwalker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Talkwalker | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Awarioawario.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Awario | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Buzzsumobuzzsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Buzzsumo | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.