Transparency alternatives to Aurora Solar
Other Solar design and proposal vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Aurora Solar. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 18 that differ from Aurora Solar on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Aurora Solar has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Aurora Solar” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Aurora Solar | Found at Aurora Solar, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RatedPowerratedpower.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RatedPower | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| GreenLancergreenlancer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GreenLancer | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| OpenSolaropensolar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenSolar | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Solariussolarius.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Solarius | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Solargrafsolargraf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Solargraf | 29/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bodhibodhisolar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bodhi | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| SolarEdgesolaredge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SolarEdge | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Valentin Softwarevalentin-software.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valentin Software | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Enerfloenerflo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Enerflo | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| EverBrightgoeverbright.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EverBright | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| PVcasepvcase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PVcase | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Sologosolo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Solo | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.