SaaS transparency ranking · Industry and operations
Solar design and proposal vendors, ranked by what they publish
Solar PV design, simulation and proposal software, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
3 vendors measured on their own sites, last on 2026-09-02. 3 ranked. A vendor we could not measure often enough gets no rank at all, rather than a bad one.
Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.
- Solar design and proposal17
- All categories26
3 vendors
Sort by Score Name Last checked
Filters (0)
- ✓ found, source linked
- × not found at the addresses we checked
- – not measured by us
- 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
-
1
Aurora Solaraurorasolar.comTransparency 57/100 CBand C
- Data processing agreement: found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Subprocessor list and 5 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 57/100 = weight of what we found (13) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 1 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 6 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 6 criteria: Subprocessor list ×3, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
2
Bodhibodhisolar.comTransparency 17/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 9 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 17/100 = weight of what we found (4) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 2 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 2 criteria: Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 10 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
3
Valentin Softwarevalentin-software.comTransparency 4/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 10 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 4/100 = weight of what we found (1) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 3 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 11 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
Tick two vendors above.
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.