SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to ScoreBreak

Other Sports team management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ScoreBreak does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from ScoreBreak on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ScoreBreak has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ScoreBreak does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and ScoreBreak does notScoreBreak publishes, and they do not
SportsEnginesportsengine.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Hudlhudl.com 50/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
TeamSnapteamsnap.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Spondspond.com 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Pitcheropitchero.com 35/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
TeamLinktteamlinkt.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Kitman Labskitmanlabs.com 30/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Trackmantrackman.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Playermakerplayermaker.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Sportradarsportradar.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Kinexonkinexon.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
UDiscudisc.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.