SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Anton

Other School management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Anton. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 55 that differ from Anton on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Anton has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Anton” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AntonFound at Anton, not found there
Fidelofidelo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fidelo 35/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Veracrossveracross.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veracross 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Edsbyedsby.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Edsby 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Gradelinkgradelink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gradelink 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Shkoloshkolo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shkolo 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sycamore Leafsycamoreleaf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sycamore Leaf 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Finalsitefinalsite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Finalsite 33/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Sduisdui.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Sdui 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Skywardskyward.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skyward 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Ayotreeayotree.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ayotree 23/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Classterclasster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Classter 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Ellucianellucian.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ellucian 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.