SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to IServ

Other School management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that IServ does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from IServ on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

IServ has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and IServ does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and IServ does notIServ publishes, and they do not
Classterclasster.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
OpenSISopensis.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Edsbyedsby.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Gradelinkgradelink.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Finalsitefinalsite.com 33/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ellucianellucian.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
itslearningitslearning.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Lernsaxlernsax.de 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
PowerSchoolpowerschool.com 19/100 1 Status page with history 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Antonanton.app 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Infinite Campusinfinitecampus.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Schulmanagerschulmanager-online.de 13/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.