SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to CRIF

Other Supply chain risk vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CRIF does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from CRIF on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CRIF has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and CRIF does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CRIF does notCRIF publishes, and they do not
Resilincresilinc.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Assentassent.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Sayarisayari.com 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Versoverso.de 43/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Dun & Bradstreetdnb.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Circulorcirculor.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare
LexisNexis Riskrisk.lexisnexis.com 39/100 1 Subprocessor list nothing Compare
TrusTracetrustrace.com 35/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
ISNisnetworld.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Avettaavetta.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Interosinteros.ai 18/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Achillesachilles.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.